serge
Forum Stalker
Posts: 4
|
Post by serge on Nov 2, 2012 19:49:35 GMT -8
Hi. Apologies for my English. First of all, thanks WOU for all the good work. I hope to get an answer about latest banlist. Saw several double and triple ban ranges. In some cases there is no difference and with some others, only player name varies. Besides having nick names, i might be overlooking other good reasons for having double and triple rangebans on the list. Something else. 190.206.84.59 //Sr8PrOssS thewatchersofurt.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=accepted&action=display&thread=129Isn't this one supposed to be a perm? Keep fighting them.
|
|
|
Post by tranc3r on Nov 2, 2012 23:18:10 GMT -8
SUP SERGE!
Thanks for pointing that out. I have added the perm to Sr8, I forgot to add in the ":-1" (I updated the current list)
As for the triple & double range bans (I wasn't able to find any triple ones), they are from URTCTF's banlist that we've incorporated. URTCTF would only add them if it were necessary, so we'll be keeping them as is.
I am assuming:
#.0.0.0:-1 <--- triple range ban #.#.0.0:-1 <--- double range ban
|
|
serge
Forum Stalker
Posts: 4
|
Post by serge on Nov 3, 2012 16:16:20 GMT -8
Hi tranc3r.
Sorry, i didn't describe correctly what i meant with: double- and triple banranges.
This is what i am pointing at: Example double: 109.193.47.0:-1 // [Gallo-Clan]Denny banned on 28/04/2012 (17:08), reason : ^7Banned for aimbot ||added from CTF East Banlist|| 109.193.47.0:-1 // [Gallo-Clan]Denny banned on 28/04/2012 (17:13), reason : ^7Banned for aimbot ||added from CTF East Banlist|| There is only a time difference in this ban.
Example tripple: 75.182.70.0:-1 // 7cardcha banned on 13/11/2011 (02:57), reason : Banned by an Echelon WebAdmin (by kEEpEr) ||added from CTF East Banlist|| 75.182.70.0:-1 // 7cardcha banned on 16/01/2012 (20:10), reason : Banned by an Echelon WebAdmin (by kEEpEr) ||added from CTF East Banlist|| 75.182.70.0:-1 // 7cardcha banned on 16/01/2012 (20:10), reason : Banned by an Echelon WebAdmin (by kEEpEr) ||added from CTF East Banlist|| Here i find date and time difference.
There are also double or triple banranges on the list with time, date and name and maybe server differences.
My point is: i don't get why same ban range is written double or triple to shared banlist.
From my point of view, shared banlist containing a single banrange only will suffice. But maybe i overlook some good reasons why they are on the list.
|
|
|
Post by tranc3r on Nov 3, 2012 16:21:31 GMT -8
Hmm, I'll remove them from the list. No need for that to be occurring when one is enough. It'll be fixed on the next update.
|
|
serge
Forum Stalker
Posts: 4
|
Post by serge on Nov 3, 2012 16:39:10 GMT -8
Sorry for this extra post...i didn't see you already answered to former post. Trying to be clear what i meant, i split my question into 2 posts.
Another example which i do not understand is: 37.49.53.0:-1 // K1ll3RM4CH1N3 banned on 20/07/2012 (12:13), reason : wall ||added from CTF East Banlist|| 37.49.53.50:-1 // K1ll3RM4CH1N3 Please use the WOU website's search feature to find info on this player. The player's addition to the banlist was done before the site was modified.
Why is the second one on the list, while he is already falling in the first ban range? There are more examples to be found. Maybe there is good reason to have them listed. If so, i love to know.
|
|
|
Post by Deathline on Nov 3, 2012 20:21:15 GMT -8
I can answer that question, seeing how I reported the guy first. I reported him a while back when I was in a certain clan, and he was confirmed for walling and botting. FSK405|kEEpEr is an admin at CTF East, and owner of this website. Tranc3r requested and was given the banlist. He just happened to be on there, and Tranc3r is far to busy to completely edit out every ban that's the same on the list because of school. I'm also really retarded and can't understand Tranc3r's "easy way of adding to the banlist."
|
|
serge
Forum Stalker
Posts: 4
|
Post by serge on Nov 5, 2012 1:11:12 GMT -8
Sorry but i feel i have to add a little more. I don't get why shared cheater banlist contains these bans.
190.87.101.0:-1 // Joaquin banned on 13/03/2012 (18:26), reason : team killing ||added from CTF East Banlist||
200.119.33.0:-1 // K banned on 29/01/2012 (12:31), reason : multi b3id ||added from CTF East Banlist||
24.193.71.0:-1 // Tiger112698 banned on 14/11/2011 (16:51), reason : tker in spawn ||added from CTF East Banlist||
24.68.145.0:-1 // Tikhonov banned on 14/03/2012 (00:24), reason : being an asshole ||added from CTF East Banlist||
75.64.48.0:-1 // WAN_KLAN-FUCK_NIGGER banned on 26/03/2012 (18:02), reason : bad name ||added from CTF East Banlist||
Are these cheaters or?
62.30.51.0:-1 // jj banned on 27/05/2012 (12:50), reason : Banned by an Echelon WebAdmin (by kEEpEr) ||added from CTF East Banlist||
69.119.14.0:-1 // tamper banned on 29/08/2012 (03:35), reason : Tk and breaking bans
74.69.124.0:-1 // GG banned on 18/01/2012 (12:33), reason : by ||added from CTF East Banlist||
77.1.220.0:-1 // CocainWhore banned on 06/03/2012 (12:56), reason : being an asshole ||added from CTF East Banlist||
I'll stop with pasting examples. Equal to above written examples there are many more similar bans on the list. Please don't get me wrong. I absolutely agree not tolerating rule offenders other than cheating but putting them on WOU shared cheaters banlist is something different imho. I also agree UrT isn't only thing in life but please polish banlist before going public. I doubt fixing things with next update being good decision. But that's my opinion.
Nothing personal. I posted with best intentions. Fighting cheaters and helping WOU.
|
|
|
Post by tranc3r on Nov 5, 2012 8:06:00 GMT -8
I tried my best to find and remove the non-cheating related ones. There were tons of non-cheating related ones when I received their banlist and I suppose these were the ones I didn't catch. I'll be sure to do another look over for the next update.
|
|
|
Post by tranc3r on Nov 5, 2012 9:37:15 GMT -8
Alright, everything should be set now. If you see further errors or have further questions, feel free to post!
|
|
|
Post by k1ll3rm4ch1n3 on May 2, 2013 11:42:12 GMT -8
to me I would like to know why ban me because I have never used cheating to play, always bad losers talk about I'm a aimboot and wallhack but as I said I have never used a trick to play I can even record a video to show my cleanest game all cry, otherwise delving into internet today I realized that there are many player with my name and make case-sensitive changes but still the same name, they will ban that and not me ? would ask that you please review the case I have registered profile with profile picture and everything. and to make it clear the only games I own are: medal of honor, assassin's creed revelations, crysis 2 that I saw my name playing cod.
|
|
|
Post by Deathline on May 2, 2013 13:44:36 GMT -8
|
|